Monday, 16 July 2018
A good tournament capped by a good final
Saturday, 14 July 2018
Luka Modric (& Zvonimir Boban) by Boris Starling
Thursday, 12 July 2018
World Cup 2018: The Tragicomic Opera of Croatia’s Mario Mandzukic bySam Knight
Tuesday, 26 June 2018
Friday, 22 June 2018
At the heart of Argentine crisis, Messi. By Jonathan Wilson
This was shambolic. Too many players tried to do too much themselves. There was altogether too much running, too much frenzy, too many fouls conceded as they desperately tried to regain possession, too little thought. By the end, as Ivan Rakitic casually rolled in a sarcastic third for Croatia, Argentina were gone, any semblance of defensive structure blown to the winds.
Had this been the final group game, the loss of discipline might have been explicable. But it was not. A 1-0 defeat Argentina could, plausibly, have got away with. Even 2-0 was just about rescuable. But now they are looking at probably having to put at least three past Nigeria in their final game, while hoping the other result goes their way. Perhaps Lionel Messi has one last miracle in him, but this would be his greatest yet.
Paulo Dybala hit upon the truth in an interview earlier in the year: Messi is simply too good. Dybala said he found him almost impossible to play with because the temptation is always simply to give him the ball. At club levels players adapt; at national level, where there is less time and a greater range of talent in the squad, it is far more difficult. Everything goes through him and that makes Argentina predictable and susceptible to being frustrated by sides that pack the centre.
Jorge Sampaoli had spoken before the tournament of the 2‑3‑3-2 he intended to use, playing Messi behind a centre-forward but with another playmaker in midfield. That – essentially a 4-4-1-1 with a midfield diamond but very attacking full‑backs – was seen only briefly in the Iceland game, after Éver Banega had replaced Lucas Biglia. In the four days since, it disappeared altogether.
Sign up to The Recap, our weekly email of editors’ picks.
Messi had told Sampaoli at an asado (barbecue) in March that he felt a 3-4-3, such as he played in for Luis Enrique at Barcelona at the end of 2016-17, didn’t work for him because it naturally drew defenders into the inside-right zone he likes to attack. Sampaoli had agreed but against Croatia he returned to that original plan. In the first half, Messi was proved right.
But at least then there was a structure. By the end, there was nothing: just players, a pitch that had become a theatre of torment, and an opposition who, also rather less than the sum of their parts, couldn’t believe their luck.
Hindsight offers hints of the devastation to come. At the anthems, Messi, staring at the ground, kept rubbing his face with his hand. He had not attended a Father’s Day asado at the team camp, staying in his room, fretting. He may still be around in Qatar in four years but he will turn 35 in June 2022. He will not be the same player. If he does, implausibly, achieve success there, it will not be as the greatest player in the world putting the final seal on his legacy but as some gnarled veteran completing one last job and achieving at the very end some redemption for an international career that has been an enormous disappointment. It’s an appealing narrative but not the one he or Argentina wanted.
Just before the second half began, Sampaoli took his place on the bench and looked almost ill, his face grey and sheened with sweat. The sense then was that he knew his side were on the brink. By the end, his jacket was off and he was reduced to waving his heavily tattooed arms in a vague lifting gesture, helpless to check the anarchy unfolding in front of him. For the defensive collapse, Messi is not at fault.
Sampaoli will be held responsible and, assuming the Argentinian Football Association can find the money to pay his compensation, he will almost certainly be dismissed. But the blame goes far deeper and begins far earlier. Sampaoli was the third coach Argentina had used in qualifying. His football, predicated on a high line and a ferocious press, was not a natural fit for Argentina’s fleet of lumbering defenders and he never had the time to find a solution. But ripping up the blueprint he had unveiled only a couple of weeks ago after one game smacked of panic. He is not the first Argentina coach to be chewed up by the chaos that surrounds the job, and he will not be the last.
But he may be the last to lead Messi at a World Cup, and that is the great sadness of their defeat. Messi remains at the absolute summit of the pantheon but he deserved a better farewell from the World Cup than this strange homage to Argentinian football’s English roots.
Tuesday, 19 June 2018
A right mindset
Serendipity. I find that the universe reaches out to me whenever I need it. A kind of cosmic helping hand. Flying off to KL this week, one though occupied my mind. Your well-being. I know you are preparing for your upcoming test and having to cope in person with high achieving relatives.
That’s how the world flows. I shared with you how I cope. I figured if things happening around me is relevant or not. I only took heed of what is pertinent. That way, the ambient “noise”, even if it is in my face, didn’t faze me. I just concentrated on what’s relevant for me. However, having said that, I felt my perspective was somehow inadequate for you. You are made differently and you care about stuff differently too.
Then serendipity. At the airport bookshop, an old management classic caught my eye. It’s about mindset.
Since the dawn of time, people have thought differently, acted differently, and fared differently from each other. It was guaranteed that someone would ask the question of why people differed, why some people are smarter or more moral – and whether there was something that made them permanently different. Experts lined up on both sides. Some claimed that there was a strong physical basis for these differences, making them unavoidable and unalterable. Through the ages these alleged physical differences have included bumps on the skull (phrenology), the size and shape of the skull (craniology), and, today, genes.
Others pointed to the strong differences in people’s backgrounds, experiences, training, or ways of learning. It may surprise you to know that a big champion of this view was Alfred Binet, the inventor of the IQ test. Wasn’t the IQ test meant to summarize children’s unchangeable intelligence? In fact, no. Binet, a Frenchman working in Paris in the early 20th century, designed this test to identify children who were not profiting from the Paris public schools, so that new educational programs could be designed to get them back on track. Without denying individual differences in children’s intellects, he believed that education and practice could bring about fundamental changes in intelligence. Here is a quote from one of his major books, Modern Ideas About Children, in which he summarizes his work with hundreds of children with learning difficulties: “A few modern philosopher’s assert that an individual's intelligence is a fixed quantity, a quantity which cannot be increased. We must protest and react against this brutal pessimism.... With practice, training, and above all, method, we manage to increase our attention, our memory, our judgment and literally to become more intelligent than we were before.”
Who’s right? Today most experts agree that it’s not either/or. It’s not nature or nurture, genes or environment. From conception on, there’s a constant give and take between the two. In fact, as Gilbert Gottlieb, an eminent neuroscientist put it, not only do genes and environment cooperate as we develop, but genes require input from the environment to work properly.
At the same time, scientists are learning that people have more capacity for life-long learning and brain development than they ever thought. Of course, each person has a unique genetic endowment. People may start with different temperaments and different aptitudes, but it is clear that experience, training, and personal effort take them the rest of the way. Robert Sternberg, the present-day guru of intelligence writes that the major factor in whether people achieve expertise “is not some fixed prior ability, but purposeful engagement.” Or, as his forerunner, Binet, recognized, it’s not always the people who start out the smartest who end up the smartest.
Believing that your qualities are carved in stone—the fixed mindset—creates an urgency to prove yourself over and over. If you have only a certain amount of intelligence, a certain personality, and a certain moral character, well then you’d better prove that you have a healthy dose of them. It simply wouldn’t do to look or feel deficient in these most basic characteristics…I’ve seen so many people with this one consuming goal of proving themselves—in the classroom, in their careers, and in their relationships. Every situation calls for a confirmation of their intelligence, personality, or character. Every situation is evaluated: Will I succeed or fail? Will I look smart or dumb? Will I be accepted or rejected? Will I feel like a winner or a loser? But doesn’t our society value intelligence, personality and character? Isn’t it normal to want these traits? Yes, but...
There’s another mindset in which these traits are not simply a hand you’re dealt and have to live with, always trying to convince yourself and others that you have a royal flush when you’re secretly worried it’s a pair of tens. In this mindset, the hand you’re dealt is just the starting point for development. This growth mindset is based on the belief that your basic qualities are things you can cultivate through your efforts. Although people may differ in every which way—in their initial talents and aptitudes, interests, or temperaments – everyone can change and grow through application and experience.
Do people with this mindset believe that anyone can be anything, that anyone with proper motivation or education can become Einstein or Beethoven? No, but they believe that a person’s true potential is unknown (and unknowable), that it’s impossible to foresee what can be accomplished with years of passion, toil, and training. Did you know that Darwin and Tolstoy were considered ordinary children? That Ben Hogan, one of the greatest golfers of all time, was completely uncoordinated and graceless as a child? That the photographer Cindy Sherman, who has been on virtually every list of the most important artists of the 20th century, failed her first photography course? That Geraldine Page, one of our greatest actresses, was advised to give it up for lack of talent?
You can see how the belief that cherished qualities can be developed creates a passion for learning. Why waste time proving over and over how great you are, when you could be getting better? Why hide deficiencies instead of overcoming them? Why look for friends or partners who will just shore up your self-esteem instead of ones who will also challenge you to grow? And why seek out the tried and true, instead of experiences that will stretch you? The passion for stretching yourself and sticking to it, even (or especially) when it’s not going well, is the hallmark of the growth mindset. This is the mindset that allows people to thrive during some of the most challenging times in their lives.
I see how hard you are working now. I know that this even stresses you somewhat. I really applaud the effort you are putting in to prepare for the test. As you do so, my wish for you is not so much to keep up your grades, or to prove to your family and friends that you are a good student. Rather, I wish for you to do so because you know and want to develop your knowledge in maths, in chemistry, in economics. A mindset to grow.
Saturday, 16 June 2018
Spain and Portugal Play a Draw for the Ages, Starring a Player for All Time By Rory Smith
All Spain’s fans could do, after it was over, was applaud. There was no sense wallowing in disappointment, worrying about what it all might mean. Spain had victory snatched away at the last moment, denied a cathartic moment by its nearest neighbor, and yet there was no bitterness, no sorrow: only admiration, and awe. Sometimes, it is not the winning, but the taking part.
There surely must have been a better World Cup group game in the past than the compelling draw between Spain and Portugal on Friday. There has to have been one played at a higher standard, one richer in drama and more absorbing. And wherever, and whenever, that game was played, it must have been truly remarkable.
Because topping what occurred on Friday is no simple task. Twice, Portugal led. Twice, Spain recovered, before Nacho Fernández scored the sort of goal that is supposed to be beyond the skill of a stand-in right back. The goal gave Spain the lead for the first time in the match and put Fernando Hierro, the Spanish coach, on course for an immense victory only one game, and two days, into his job. And then Cristiano Ronaldo, yet again, intervened.
If Spain’s preparations for this game have been troubled — firing its previous coach, Julen Lopetegui, on the eve of the tournament for failing to disclose that he was about to take charge at Real Madrid — then Portugal’s have scarcely been better.
Several members of the team, which won the European championship in 2016, are on the verge of rescinding their club contracts, at Lisbon’s Sporting C.P., because of intimidation by fans and a breakdown in their relationship with the club’s president.
On Friday morning, meanwhile, only a few hours before the game, it emerged in Spanish news media reports that Ronaldo himself had agreed to pay the Spanish authorities $21.8 million in unpaid taxes. He has also been given a two-year suspended jail sentence, the papers said. It would be hard to believe that these developments did not faze him as the game approached.
Still, it was Ronaldo who gave Portugal the lead, winning and converting a penalty after just four minutes of play. And it was Ronaldo who restored the lead, his shot squirming under David De Gea, the Spanish goalkeeper, as the first half drew to a close. And it was Ronaldo who, with just a few minutes remaining in the second half, lined up a free kick a little outside the Spanish penalty area with Portugal now trailing, 3-2.
He had taken 44 free kicks in previous World Cups. He had scored on none of them. Still, you know what they say: the 45th time’s a charm.
It is true that Ronaldo, at 33, is not the player he was. He is still perfectly sculpted, of course, a Men’s Health magazine cover made flesh, but the electric pace has fizzled a little; he does not cover quite as much ground (only one player, the Portuguese defender José Fonte, ran less than Ronaldo in a first half in which one of them scored twice).
But it is equally true to say that Ronaldo, even in his twilight, shines brighter than almost any player with whom he comes into contact. He has not so much faded as a player as evolved into something different. It is misleading to suggest that he has transformed into a striker, a penalty- area predator, because he is not really restricted by such mortal concepts as geography.
Instead, he has attained a level of such devastating efficiency that he now does not really require something so mundane as the ball. He does not need to be involved. He looks, often, like he is doing nothing, or something quite close to it — as if he is a mere passenger. It is an illusion. He is always in the cockpit.
Isco, his Real Madrid teammate, was the dominant player on the field here, the one who was most involved, who prompted and probed and prodded, and he was wearing a Spain jersey. Ronaldo has moved beyond needing to dictate games. He concerns himself only with defining them.
His free kick, needless to say, curled artfully, effortlessly, past De Gea and into the corner of Spain’s goal, as Ronaldo — despite all historical evidence to the contrary — must have known it would.
Portugal, which is now best thought of as a nation established in 1128 so that it might one day produce Cristiano Ronaldo, would have its draw. More important, the 2018 World Cup had its spark. The afterglow of a game like this can last for a couple of weeks, at least; on this stage, it can resonate around the world.
Spain would have been forgiven for feeling like a victim. It had been the better team in this game, had more of the ball, created more opportunities, played the slicker, smoother soccer.
It had looked every inch a contender for a World Cup title and nothing like a side still reeling from Lopetegui’s departure, shaken to its core by a dispute between its players and their ultimate bosses at the country’s federation, having to adjust to life under a new coach who, until now, had only managed one second-division team.
That Spain’s players did not let all this deter them on Friday only served to emphasize the scale of Ronaldo’s performance and the overall quality of the match.
And when the final whistle blew, the stadium stood: not just the clusters of Portuguese fans, not just the neutrals and the Russians, but the Spanish fans, too, in those blood-red jerseys. They applauded their own team, of course; there was enough encouragement there to see the bigger picture, to believe that the tumult of the last few days may not be fatal to their hopes.
But when Spain’s players had left the field, and Portugal’s stood in the center circle, the Spanish fans remained standing, and they kept clapping, as every single Portuguese player sought out Ronaldo, to clasp his hand, to ruffle his hair, as though just to touch him was to brush against something holy.
They do not mind that he attracts — demands, really — all of the attention. They do not mind being in the supporting cast, just as those Spanish fans did not mind providing the audience for the three acts of his one-man show. Sometimes, it is a pleasure simply to be there; sometimes, it is a pleasure just to sit back and watch. And at the end, sometimes there is nothing to do but applaud.
■ Here’s how it happened:
Full Time: Spain 3, Ronaldo 3
Ronaldo has produced one of the most remarkable individual performances you could possibly hope to see, and illuminated what will take some beating as the best game of the tournament. Portugal hasn’t been discussed much as a contender for the World Cup, despite being European champion. This may have been an oversight.
Saturday, 24 March 2018
The larger perspective
Saturday, 10 March 2018
Some things are worth collecting
Thursday, 1 March 2018
Present
J, sometimes stuff happens to remind us of what is important.
Take this gift of a camera: it is more than just a replacement for the one lost in linville gorge. In fact, it's more than just a birthday present; though a 21st birthday ought to be celebrated with a commensurately meaningful gift 😀. It's a testimony of love for a wonderful son from his parents. A visceral reminder that though he is now legally an adult and can do many things independently, there will always be people who will love him and do what they can to see to his wellbeing and happiness. That is what this gift is. And made all the more poignant because it is meant to help overcome the loss of another gift.
As an adult, J, inevitably you will lose a number of things. But these are mere objects and can be replaced. Often the act of replacement is a joyous one (or can be certainly made into a happy occasion). In this case, the new camera represents the very latest in visual technology and the Sony Alpha cameras are widely regarded to be the benchmark today, not unlike what Leica was in the last century. But what really makes a replacement truly joyful is the people who help make it happen.
https://m.dpreview.com/reviews/sony-alpha-7-ii
It is therefore so fitting that this new camera will accompany you on your 21st birthday, on your first spring break. May it capture happy moments to remind you of the love you have created and deserve.
Thursday, 1 February 2018
Making Our Own Histories
Wednesday, 24 January 2018
"Can't believe you are at that big shot event"
Verbatim quote from M, as I sent her a picture of me in Davos attending the World Economic Forum. Guess she knows a thing or two about this global gathering of elites. Yes, it's a talkfest. Yes, it can be a bonfire of vanities. But there is no doubt important ideas are being shared... and the delegates I hope are doing as much listening as they are talking and therefore formulating even more holistic solutions to the problems of the world today.
The theme this year is "shaping a common future of our fractured world". Indeed from income inequality, gender disparities, racism, nationalism, there are many fault lines and these have to be addressed.
This entry, though, is not about improving the state of the world. I have written about that elsewhere. This is more about what M so startlingly observed.
Though she knows what job I do, overhears the conference calls I have with my staff, and accompany me on privileged access to institutions like the Rhodes Trust in Oxford, she has yet to calibrate me to this level of world elite a-la Davos.
It gave me pause to reflect on how I got here. For a start, I was here 22 years ago, courtesy of an EDB officer who had to leave early and loaned D and I his apartment and his pass. Security was less tight then and with his pass, I was able to wander into the congress centre and bumped into the Palestinian Yasser Arafat (and was duly frisked by his security guard). In fact in that meeting, Arafat shared the stage with his Israel counterpart Shimon Peres in a session that truly inspired the world. But I was merely a spectator then. I had no part in understanding what happened, let alone making it happen. So, not one of them.
This year I am one of them. In fact there is still no peace between Palestine and Israel. The two leaders are now gone, Peres being tragically assassinated. The world is still fractured. The most exciting person I have met so far is Will.I.Am from Black Eyed Peas!
But I am hoping to add my voice to those here on finding a solution. How did I get my voice heard so?
When I first moved to Singapore, for my studies back in 1985, the Singapore dream was a materialistic one. Goh Chok Tong called it the 5 C's: cash, card, condo, car and club. Attaining all of these meant one has arrived. The good life, Singapore style.
How did I get here?
Yes, I got the 5 C's. But more importantly, it's what I used to get here. Another 5 C's: competence, communication, confidence, commitment and carpe diem. In fact, if one possesses these 5 C's, any outcome is attainable, including being a big shot.
Competence... result of both god's grace and made real with effort
Communication... one's competence however will not be known if it is not properly communicated, verbally, in writing and in action; and in all it's guises (ranging from persuasion to inspiration to compulsion)
Commitment... what really adds power to the above combination of competence and communication is the ability to deeply commit to seeing something to fruition. It completes the loop and let's everyone know you live up to your word and your potential.
Confidence... the complete loop above produces this magical elixir of success. Nothing is as heady as knowing one can dream it and do it. When infused with this, one can take on anything.
Carpe diem... finally, one can always be helped with a bit of Lady Luck. Sometimes events transpire to place us in a position to show our competence, our communication, our commitment, our confidence. Seize it. Fully. Put all previous C's on display.
That's how I got here. And now you know. My wish is for M who uttered this profound statement to similarly imbibe these 5 C's and fulfill her own dreams.