Friday, 5 May 2017

Her very first national finals!

After 5 years of playing the game, M and her team finally made it to the finals of the nationals, girls 'A' division at that! And they would play at the Kallang Diamond, home of the national team. What a way to cap her dedication to the game.

She has won in other tournaments before, notably in the ASEAN regional, with the Singapore u-15 team, and at the SRC earlier this year which served as a good warmup. But not with this team.


For 5 years, they harboured dreams of being national champions, they have not been. In fact, they have not even played in the finals, let alone win one. They haven't won it yet but they did get through the semifinals, against a good team, by 1 run! More poignantly, she had a wonderful hit that earned her team a run and got her to 3rd base. Way to go, my darling! I am so happy for her.

The fighting spirit is what it takes to get them here. The same fighting spirit that keeps them on edge could tear them apart as they jostle to win not just as a team but also as individuals. It's a lesson in life and I trust M will learn it well. How she gives and takes, leads and follows are valuable lessons. As she grows up, and as I found with her Brother, life is their teacher now. As parents, we only can hope that the foundation to continuously learn from and grow from life's lessons are well established.

Wednesday, 3 May 2017

Success v Happiness

D & I have been having this running (or rather trickling) discussion on which is the right aspiration to aim for: to be successful or simply to be happy. At another level, this question can be made more complicated: can one pursue success (in whatever field) and be happy?

It has been my life-long conviction that having and pursuing an aspiration defines the value of a human life. This is the result of having watched the majority of my fellow citizens live off the land and government handouts that they no longer have any hunger, and aspire for nothing more than a modified motorcycle, a guitar and a pair of jeans. They don't progress. Nor do the nation.

Then D threw a curved ball into my mind. She asked if despite this lackadaisical condition, they are actually happy. Conversely, those pursuing success, those with aspiration (fulfilled or otherwise), are they truly happy. Because wouldn't they keep wanting more. And hence are never satisfied and therefore never fully happy.

Both D and M sent me the same blog, authored by a 17 year old student.

https://rafflespress.com/2017/05/01/the-pressure-to-be-extraordinary/

The Pressure to Be Extraordinary

By Deborah Lee (17A01D)

Every year, approximately half of the Year 6 cohort score distinctions for all 4 H2 A Level subjects, and a quarter achieve a perfect University Admission Score. It would be a lie to say that most students do not feel a pressure to be part of these annual statistics, to be contributors towards the exemplary results that are often associated with the Raffles name. However, this pressure does not merely permeate the academic sphere alone, but extends much further into the future domain of career choices. This can particularly be seen through Career and Scholarship Days in Raffles usually boasting participating establishments that are mostly government organisations, ministries, and other prominent institutions. While this is far from unexpected, given the number of notable alumni in distinguished public service positions, it does give rise to the question of whether the career paths suggested for Raffles students are wider in certain directions, and narrower in other diverging routes.

An informal poll with 63 respondents found that 89% believed that there exists a pressure for Raffles students to find a conventional and well-paying job in the future. This likely includes jobs in law, the medical field, business, as well as with other prestigious organisations. The reason as to why this particular belief exists could perhaps be the extensive list of illustrious alumni, and the fact that year after year, many Guests Of Honour that are invited to grace school occasions are also part of this list. All of this serves to affirm the presumption that there is a tendency for alumni to undertake impressive careers after graduation, thus placing expectations on younger batches to continue the trend.

But what about the students who wish to follow less conventional career paths? Do they receive the affirmation that they should follow their dreams, or do they become weighed down by the typical expectations that come from being in this school? 12 fellow Rafflesians were asked about their dream jobs, in a scenario where they would not have to worry about practicality and finances, and answers ranged from bartending to becoming a Taekwondo coach.

infographic

Upon first look at the above infographic, would you have associated the jobs with Raffles alumni?From a young age, we have been told that we should chase our dreams, but does that mean that once we become students of a prestigious school, our dreams should be tailored to fit a conventional mould that is deemed proper? Of course, certain arguments against this might be put forth, most particularly that large sums of money have been invested in our holistic education and in turn we should go on to give back as much as we can to society. The idea of this is usually fulfilled through taking up jobs in public service and other highly-skilled sectors that our quality education has enriched and equipped us for. Therein lies the pressure for Rafflesian students—given the amount of resources that have been allocated to our education, we then feel pressured to go into these jobs that are perceived as high-value added and fairly conventional.

We are definitely fortunate to be able to benefit from impressive campus facilities, dedicated staff, and various exchange and enrichment programmes. However, this does not mean that we, as a society at large as well as Rafflesians ourselves, should start viewing education as a transactional process: inputting resources and then churning out public service scholars and alumni with excellent credentials as the sole expected product. To do this would reduce education to a mere factory line production and further place stress on students to perform well by feeding into the notion that the ways in which we give back to society must necessarily be extraordinary– “Here, we’re giving you a good education, so you have to get good grades and a good job in future.” This in turn perpetuates the impression that the only concern that matters to students should be the credentials and prestige that come with the Raffles name, which shall then be used to find a fairly conventional but successful job in future. The issue with this is the persistent sense of obligation that weighs on the shoulders of every Rafflesian to become accomplished, outstanding, impressive: the pressure to be extraordinary.

The quality education that we receive definitely should not be considered unconditional, since we should indeed be grateful for the opportunities offered to us and give back to society in one way or another. Giving back, however, should not be interpreted as an action only accomplishable by those in high-paying jobs and prominent government positions. We can all give back in different ways, regardless of the jobs we do. The bookshop owner provides a safe haven for bookworms; the guitarist thrills listeners with the enchantment of music; and the traveller brings glimpses of a larger world to those stuck in an unmoving place. Giving back isn’t only done by CEOs, Ministers and those in highly respected positions; it is something that everyone can do as long as they make a conscious effort. The prestige of a job shouldn’t and doesn’t define your success as a person, and while it might be important to some, you don’t have to prioritise it if you are in pursuit of other aspirations.

There are days when we look at our marks, our grades, and perhaps wonder if we will eventually be able to live up to the Raffles name. We wonder if we can ever catch up with the straight A’s that are synonymous with our school’s reputation and move on to bag scholarships and high-paying jobs. It’s a constant worry, an incessant nagging at the back of our minds whenever we are reminded that A Levels are not a distant concern, but an impending threat. However, it’s all right if we don’t end up fitting in this mould. It’s all right if we don’t get an excellent set of grades, if we don’t move on to a job that we think is befitting of a Raffles alumni. 

Life is much bigger than the expectations placed on us during the few years of our teenage lives. We don’t need an extraordinarily big house, an extraordinarily flashy car, or an extraordinarily prestigious job to be happy. Yes, a conventional job does have its undeniable benefits, mainly the security that comes with a tested and stable career. However, a question we have to answer, is whether we are willing to trade our true passion for practicality.

Life will be full of risks that we have to take and it will admittedly be too short to regret the paths wanted, but not taken, because we feared impracticality and uncertainty. Perhaps, in order to pursue the passions close to our hearts, the risk is one that is worth taking.  To all the prospective bartenders, backpackers, and hairdressers out there, don’t feel guilty about wanting to pursue your dreams. True, you may have been fortunate to receive a good education, but don’t let the pressure force you to become someone bigger than you want to be.

A small, energetic spirit is sometimes better than a large empty shell, and there can always be something extraordinary found in all things seemingly ordinary.

I was asked what I thought. I shared three reactions:
1. It's very well written. Good logic with quantitative facts juxtaposed with emotionally compelling arguments
2. It ignored that RI has produced many who have chosen the path less taken and found fame (even infamy) eg Kit Chan, Stefanie Sun, Emma Yong and Pastor Kong Hee. So, it's not true that there are only a few chosen occupations. The larger point she missed is that Rafflesians are groomed to go to the heights of their professions whatever they may be.
3. The point that really resonated with me though is that one should not close off any options too soon. As kids, we could be anything. As college students, we start to narrow our choice set.  We don't have to. Go for whatever our hearts desire. Just make it a happy journey.

M liked my third point. The larger message in that point is it is possible to be happy if you want for nothing. It is however all the more fulfilling when we are pursuing something our heart desires, and we find it. That's happiness. The question therefore is, what does your heart tell you?


Friday, 14 April 2017

Easter gifts

We have always celebrated Easter as a family, rejoicing in the fact that Jesus rose from the dead. He showed us that our life on earth is but a moment in time. There is more, beyond. And that we need to spend our minutes and days well.

So this Easter, I wanted to make time visceral and to remind us that it is perpetual. Naturally, a self winding mechanical watch, powered only by the kinetic energy of the wearer, is a fitting gift.

But these gifts are more than just reminders of God's promise to us. They are also tokens of my love to both of you.

As you know, I am in the middle of an 8 city, 11 flight, 18 day round the world trip from Munich to Washington DC, then Riyadh and Dubai and back to KL and Singapore (where I am spending the easter weekend) and out again to Amsterdam and Berlin before returning to Singapore again.

Jet lag, red eye flights, unfamiliar rooms and uncomfortable pillows all conspire to make me miss you all more. Indeed, I already started longing for you as I was setting off to Munich knowing it'd be two weeks before I will see you again.

So there in this pretty catholic German city, I walked into the renowned watch retailer, Wempe, and bought a special watch for M. The Metro was a major milestone for Nomos; it was the first watch to feature a movement with the Swing Sytstem. Beyond that, the Metro Neomatik is simply a great watch with one of Nomos’ quirkiest designs (brought to life by famed industrial designer, Mark Braun).

And it is the design that reminded me of M. She has always possessed a great sense of style and I instinctively know she would agree with Mark Braun's creation, petitely made like she is: all simple elegance. What drew me even more to the watch is the night blue colour of its dial. It is the sheen of the deep sea. It is the shade of the night sky just before the stars shine the brightest. So when she looks at the watch, she can also imagine her dad who is often overseas as well as her brother who in due time will be halfway around the world. In short, it's a poetic colour, befitting M's creative (if sometimes moody) soul. Last but not least, her mom has the same watch (also a gift from me, being the 27th anniversary of our first date). Three good reasons why this watch is the best instrument to keep time for M!

I even wore this watch a few days on my trip so technically I am giving her my watch.

Similarly, for J, I wanted something special too and in the same value as the one I got for M, to be fair. Indeed, I have been looking for this watch since the start of the year when I first saw it. I finally found it in Dubai, fittingly for a newly promoted Lieutenant who needs to help keep peace in the world.

It's the baby Brother of a watch I just bought, though mine is in the signature green Color of the brand. This watch needs to be different.

He is a rugged chap and needs something that fits his lifestyle. So a watch that is meant to withstand diving the depths of the seas and yet bears the colour of the earth should serve the purpose. Indeed since getting him his first watch, a Luminox, he has shown good interest in timepieces and proceeded to buy two himself (one in Taipei and one online). I thought I should add to his collection with something quite special. According to HODINKEE (my Favourite watch review site), the Tudor Heritage "Black Bay Bronze is one of those watches that, whether intentionally or not, serves as a reminder that nowadays, a lot of us find it hard to settle down and make a commitment to That One Special Watch. The whole point of the Black Bay Bronze, I think, is to watch it gradually change, from one day to the next. Seeing the patina on the bronze slowly begin to darken the original, almost milky-gold hue of the bronze of the case is an enormous pleasure, taken one day to the next."
This is a watch that will become uniquely yours, as its patina develops based on how, where and who wears it. I thought it fitting that as J goes off to the US to study environment that he has a watch with a diamond second hand and snowflake hour hand. And as he exposes it to his environment, this watch will change its hues but fundamentally it remains a faithful keeper of time.  Indeed these are developments we wish on both M and J that they keep growing in their own unique ways but deep down inside remain rooted in their faith, and may this little piece of mechanical wonder on their wrist serve to remind them of the love all around.


. 

Thursday, 16 March 2017

Confessions of a watch geek

At the start of 2016, I had a bad feeling. Time was not working right. Some weeks were as snappy as days, others were as elastic as months, and the months felt as if they were either bleeding into one another three at a time—Jabruarch—or segmenting into Gregorian-calendar city-states. Feb. Rue. Airy. Something was wrong with the world.

One day in February, I took a ride on the subway. This was a rare occurrence. Since turning forty, I’d started to suffer from a heightened sense of claustrophobia. A few years ago, I was stuck for an hour in an elevator with a man who weighed about three hundred and fifty pounds and his two grocery carts crammed with bags of Tostitos and bottles of Canada Dry, an experience both frightening and lonely. The elevator had simply given up. What if a subway train also refused to move? I began walking seventy blocks at a time or splurging on taxis. But on this day I had taken the N train. Somewhere between Forty-ninth Street and Forty-second Street, a signal failed and we ground to a halt. For forty minutes, we stood still. An old man yelled at the conductor at full volume in English and Spanish. Time and space began to collapse around me. The orange seats began to march toward each other. I was no longer breathing with any regularity. This is not going to end well. None of this will end well. We will never leave here. We will always be underground. This, right here, is the rest of my life. I walked over to the conductor’s silver cabin. He was calmly explaining to the incensed passenger the scope of his duties as an M.T.A. employee. “Sir,” I said to him, “I feel like I’m dying.”

“City Hall, City Hall, we got a sick passenger,” he said into the radio. “I repeat, a sick passenger. Can you send a rescue train?”
A rescue train. My whole life I have been waiting for one. Sensing the excitement of someone suffering more than they were, the other passengers moved to my end of the car to offer advice, crowding in on me and making me panic all the more. One man was particularly insistent. “I’m a retired firefighter,” he said. “I’ve been doing this twenty years, folks. Seen it all. This man here is hyperventilating. That’s what he’s doing. Twenty years a firefighter, now retired.”
“I’m going to take an Ativan now,” I said, fishing a pill out of my breast pocket.
“Do not do that,” the retired firefighter said. “It will only make you hyperventilate more. Trust me, I know what I’m doing.”
A middle-aged woman approached me. “You have to imagine,” she said to me, in a Polish accent, “that eventually the train will move. That eventually we will come out of the tunnel.”

Shamed into not taking the Ativan by the retired firefighter, I looked down at my wrist. I was wearing a new watch, the first mechanical watch I had ever owned. A brief primer: Since the late nineteen-seventies, most watches have used a quartz movement, which is battery-powered and extremely accurate. Mechanical watches, by contrast, are powered either by hand-winding or, in the case of an automatic watch, by the motion of the wearer’s wrist, which is converted into energy by means of a rotor. Mechanical watches are far less accurate than quartz watches, but often far more expensive, because their bearings are more intricate. All contemporary Rolex watches, for example, are mechanical. The difference between quartz and old-fashioned mechanical is that your child’s Winnie the Pooh watch will likely keep better time than a seventy-six-thousand-dollar Vacheron Constantin perpetual calendar in rose gold. A quick way to tell the two kinds apart is to look at the second hand. On a quartz watch, the second hand goose-steps along one tick at a time; on a mechanical watch, it glides imperfectly, but beautifully, around the dial and into the future.

Looking at the smooth, antiquated mechanical glide of my watch’s second hand, I felt, if not calm, then ready for whatever happened next. As the conductor’s radio flared on and off with promises from City Hall (my rescue train never came), as the passengers around me discussed my fate, I wondered: Can you hold your own world together while the greater world falls apart? The visible passing of time, second by second, seemed to provide a kind of escape route, even as my body remained within the metal shell of the stricken N train. Three seconds, inhale. Three seconds, exhale. The watch was a Junghans, from Germany, derived from a design by the Bauhaus-influenced Swiss architect, artist, and industrial designer Max Bill. I had bought it at the moma shop for what in my early, innocent watch days seemed like the astronomical price of a thousand dollars. Its no-frills, form-follows-function shape evoked civility in a time of chaos, a ticking intelligence in the face of a new inhumanity. The train slowly moved again. The Polish woman smiled at me. We shuddered into Times Square and I was, for a few moments in time, safe.



Every watch geek has an origin story. During childhood, my first best friend was a watch, a Casio H-108 12-Melody-Alarm. True to its name, the digital watch played twelve melodies, including “Santa Lucia,” “Happy Birthday,” “The Wedding March,” “Jingle Bells” (played only in the bathroom of my Hebrew school, when no other Jewish boys were present), and even a song from my native Russia, “Kalinka” (roughly, “Red Little Berry”), which I listened to every hour on the hour to make myself feel less homesick and scared. I spoke English miserably, but the watch had its own language, a computerese series of squeaks issuing from a tiny Japanese speaker to form passable melodies. My parents had bought me the watch at a Stern’s department store in Queens for $39.99, a significant part of their net worth at the time, and it was easily my favorite possession, until it caught the eye of a Hebrew-school bully. My grandmother marched into the principal’s office and used the hundred or so English words at her disposal—“Bad boychik take watch!”—to lobby for its safe return.

Eventually, I made human friends, and my musical Casio disappeared for good. My relationship with watches from that point on coincided with the women in my life. In high school, my mother bought me a quartz Seiko, which pinched my budding wrist hair with its loose gold-plated bracelet, and was a bit out of place at my next stop, Oberlin, where comrades were not encouraged to have gold-plated things. After college, a girlfriend bought me a Diesel watch with the image of at least six continents on its dial, to indicate just how “worldly” I was, and a subsequent girlfriend had it repaired after we had broken up, a gesture of unusual kindness.
But by this time I thought of myself as a writer, and, for a writer, the money you make can be traded in for your creative independence, hence one is permanently building a rainy-day fund. I have always tried to keep on hand enough cash to cover at least two years of expenses in case the public stops being interested in my work, while plowing the rest into low-cost index funds. Thrift was comforting; material goods uninteresting, bordering on gauche.

And yet on April 12, 2016, I walked out of the Tourneau TimeMachine store, on Madison Avenue and Fifty-seventh Street, with a receipt for $4,137.25 and a new Nomos Minimatik Champagner on my wrist, the sales clerks bidding me farewell with a cheerful cry of “Congratulations!” By the standards of luxury watches, the amount I spent was small indeed (an entry-level Rolex is about six thousand dollars), but by my own standards I had just thrown away a small chunk, roughly 4.3 writing days, of my independence. And yet I was happy. The watch was the most beautiful object I had ever seen. After my panic attack on the subway, the urge for another Bauhaus-inspired watch had become overwhelming, and I compared many brands. The winner was a relatively new watchmaker called Nomos, based in the tiny Saxon town of Glashütte.

An early-spring sun glinted off my watch as I walked down Lexington Avenue. I took a photograph of the Minimatik on my wrist, as if at any moment I would be forced to give it back. There is an entire genre of watch aficionados who take photos of themselves wearing their timepieces in front of landmarks and post them on watch forums. Would I become one of them? I ducked into a Pakistani place to eat a quail, but was worried about splashing grease on the vegetable-tanned natural-leather strap. The dial was champagne-colored, with an unexpected circle of neon orange around the seconds’ subdial. (“These are wild colors but in homeopathic doses,” one of Nomos’s marketing texts reads.) The Minimatik’s lugs—the four parts that extend from the case and connect the watch to either a strap or a bracelet—were contoured and feminine, as was the gently domed sapphire crystal, a sharp rebuke to the dinner-plate aesthetic you see on so many watches meant for men. Nomos does not market its watches to either gender—their relatively small size is meant both for women and for men with nothing to prove. The hour markers were pearled, and milled into the champagne dial to pick up its brass hue. The watch seemed to absorb and reflect light in its own way, storing it under its arched sapphire, making it golden.

I took the watch off and turned it over. Some of the more interesting watches have an exhibition-case back, allowing you to see the inner workings. The Nomos calibre, assembled almost entirely from hundreds of minuscule parts made in Germany, is a riot of sunburst decoration, tempered blue screws, and a small constellation of rubies. A tiny golden balance wheel spins back and forth, regulating the time (think of a pendulum swinging on a grandfather clock, but at a tremendously fast clip), and this action, to many viewers, gives the watch the appearance of being alive. It is not uncommon for some watch enthusiasts to call this part of the watch its “heart,” or even its “soul.” The Nomos was not a quartz watch built by robots in a giant Asian factory. A German man or woman with real German problems had constructed this piece, blue screw by blue screw.

I was obsessed. And I had time to indulge my obsession. I believe that a novelist should write for no more than four hours a day, after which returns truly diminish; this, of course, leaves many hours for idle play and contemplation. Usually, such a schedule results in alcoholism, but sometimes a hobby comes along, especially in middle age. For us so-called W.I.S., or Watch Idiot Savants, all roads led to one Internet site: Hodinkee, the name being a slightly misspelled take on hodinky, the Czech word for “watch.” Hours of my days were now spent refreshing the site, looking at elaborate timepieces surrounded by wrist hair and Brooks Brothers shirt cuffs, and learning an entirely new language and nomenclature. By this point, it was becoming clear that Donald Trump would be the Republican nominee. Hodinkee became a natural refuge, a place where I could watch videos of celebrity Watch Idiot Savants talking about their obsession in terms that made me feel less obsessive myself. The rapper Pras, of Fugees fame: “I think about my watches. Like when I get up in the morning.”

Hodinkee is the brainchild of Ben Clymer, a thirty-four-year-old watch impresario. In the outside world, no one really understood me, or the value of tempered blue screws. My sister-in-law pointed out, not incorrectly, that I might be suffering a midlife crisis. But, in Watch World, you enter a room and everybody wants to discuss micro-rotors with you. As Cara Barrett, one of the few women writers on Hodinkee’s staff, told me, “Micro-rotors are pretty damn adorable.”

At Hodinkee’s headquarters, which occupy a loft space in Nolita, every object is tasteful, much like the twenty-some mostly young people working there. In addition to publishing the most passionate watch journalism on the Web (and the most incensed readers’ comments), the site sells its own watchbands and vintage watches. Hodinkee’s statistics reflect the often rarefied world of watch collecting. The average visitor has an income of three hundred thousand dollars, owns five to seven watches, and buys two or three more a year at an average cost of seven thousand dollars each.

I spoke with Clymer at Hodinkee’s offices. After I launched into a long soliloquy on a certain Zenith gold-filled chronograph, he said to me, “Wow, you’re in deep.” I took this as a huge compliment, but it was also a sign of how my life was unravelling. Hillary Clinton had just collapsed at the 9/11 ceremony, FiveThirtyEight was showing the election tightening, and my shrink—also a watch nut—had just been telling me about the toll the election was taking on his patients. Yes, I was in deep, but weren’t we all? A dear friend of mine who lives in Putin’s Russia collects high-end shaving supplies. He once spent part of a visit to New York on the trail of some kind of badger-hair brush. I remembered all those old Soviet-era Russians humming math problems in their heads or playing twelve hours of competitive chess with themselves. In a society hopeless and cruel, the particular and the microscopic were the only things that could still prove reliable.

Clymer is preternaturally calm and sumptuously bearded, a self-described “old soul,” who ticks as reliably as a chronometer granted the all-important Geneva Seal. The origin story of his watch obsession begins with a grandfather he called Papa, whose urbane New York tastes he admired as a kid growing up in snowy suburban Rochester, and whose gift to his grandson of an Omega Speedmaster “inspired me to do the whole thing.” Clymer also started out with what has been called “the collecting gene.” He wore a Volkswagen Beetle costume for his fifth birthday and collected old Bakelite rotary phones, which he bought at fifty cents apiece. His personal collection of watches is impressive—for example, a gold Patek Philippe with the Golden Rule inscribed on its dial, which Lyndon Johnson gave to his allies and underlings—and he has likely made a small fortune from buying and selling timepieces over the years, but he’s also harnessed nostalgia in a way that feels real.

Hodinkee’s influence is felt throughout the watch industry. Clymer has helped Jerry Seinfeld and Jay Z pick out their wrist wear (Jay Z wanted “the least rapper watch possible”). The shrinking size of some of the more intriguing watches for men can, arguably, be traced back to Hodinkee and its assault on what some in the watch world call “penis-extenders”—those overwrought testosterone timepieces pumped out by newer brands like Hublot, but also by old stalwarts like Patek and Rolex. If you want a watch that looks like a Russian oligarch just curled up around your wrist and died, you might be interested in the latest model of Rolex’s Sky-Dweller.

As the election approached, I started going to meetings of the Horological Society of New York. On the streets of Manhattan, I never have any idea which celebrity is which—they all seem to be Matt Damon—but at the Horological Society I could identify all my new heroes, many with full, Portlandian beards, across the vast hall of the library of the General Society of Mechanics and Tradesmen, in midtown, while they waited in line for their free coffee and Royal Dansk butter cookies. There was the nattily dressed Kiran Shekar—yes, the Kiran Shekar, noted collector, author, and proprietor of the independent watch purveyor Contrapante. I ran over to introduce myself and a few moments later he gave me his watch to hold, and a few weeks later he arranged for me to attend the secret RedBar, a meeting of the watch elect, at a bar in Koreatown. You need a regular to invite you to a meeting, and the idea that I could be welcomed into this exclusive world kept me from sleeping. I lay in bed practicing what I might say about “perlage,” “three-quarter plates,” and the rare lapis-lazuli dials on some seventies Rolex Datejusts.

At the gathering of the RedBar Crew, there was a Brooklyn watchmaker’s apprentice from Australia, a woman from Latin America carefully taking pictures of a prized Rolex Daytona, a guy from Helsinki with his own brand of massive watches, and a young man with a hundred-and-fifty-dollar Citizen. No watch is rejected here, and there is no hierarchy. Just as at the Horological Society, the attendees skew young, a surprise considering youth’s supposed slavishness to all things digital, and there are a growing number of women—RedBar’s chief operating officer is the collector Kathleen McGivney. There was a boozy meat-market scene in the rest of the bar, which was filled with loud music and twentysomething Koreans on the make. But, in the section reserved for the W.I.S. crowd, we sipped whiskey as we stripped off our watches in our small brightly lit safe space. I threw my Nomos on a long covered table and an exuberantly bearded dude pawed at it while I got my hands on a cheap but sturdy Seiko diver and an “honest” Omega Speedmaster. Swiss luxury watches may be made with the one per cent in mind, but true aficionados know that the hegemony of the Swiss is over; some of the most interesting watches now come from German brands like Nomos and A. Lange and Japan’s Grand Seiko. I missed out on the culmination of the evening, when all the watches were piled up for an Instagram photo with the hashtag #sexpile, but as I wandered into the autumn night my Nomos beat warmly against my wrist.

In October, my feelings of dread spiked, and so I decided to buy a Rolex. Not a new one, of course, but something vintage—in this case, an Air-King from the seventies. I spotted one on the site of a dealer from Boston. It had a perfect “bluejean” dial and well-preserved hands, and a brown leather strap that I knew would contrast perfectly with the blue dial, as if my whole world were just cool and casual and everything was going to be O.K. After it arrived, I got in touch with Eric Wind, one of the top watch experts at Christie’s, who told me that the dial was indeed rare and the hands “extraordinary.” But, as I suspected, the case had been overpolished, because the lugs were too sharp and thin. (“Thick, beefy lugs” is a mantra for watch collectors; and most would prefer a scuffed “honest” case over something buffed and shiny.) Still, Wind valued the watch at about six hundred and fifty dollars more than I’d paid for it—my first potential profit as a Watch Idiot Savant.

I started looking at the Air-King’s frantic second hand for hours, and listening to its serious ticking, which sounded like a surly boxer before the first round. When I was a kid, in the eighties, Rolex was shorthand for “yuppie.” To console myself that I had not become one, I thought of all the rap lyrics featuring the brand. “Girl you look fine / like a wide-face Rolex, you just shine,” Biggie Smalls rapped on “Fuck You Tonight.” “They took my rings, they took my Rolex,” Warren G commiserates with Nate Dogg on “Regulate.” “I looked at the brotha, said ‘Damn, what’s next?’ ”

At a lecture that Jack Forster, Hodinkee’s editor-in-chief, gave at the Horological Society, a photograph of a lonely Antarctic research station flashed on the projection screen. Speaking of its inhabitants, Forster said, “In Antarctica, there is no time except from the civilization that sent them there.” He went on to discuss the very subjectivity of time. “A month is not the same month from one month to the next. A year isn’t.” I looked into the reassuring deep blue of my old Rolex. I’m familiar with the concept of leap years, of course, but Forster was saying that no one month, year, minute, hour is exactly, perfectly equivalent to any other. What hope do we have of regulating our lives, if time itself is an unsturdy, possibly political construct?

“There’s something very mournful about watches,” Forster told me, after the lecture. When I got home, I checked my Air-King and Nomos and Junghans against the atomic clock of time.gov. The Nomos had lost five seconds in the previous twenty-four hours, the Junghans close to ten, and the Rolex had gained fifteen. It took an average of three timepieces to tell the actual time. We were using watches to calculate our own demise, and we weren’t even doing it accurately.

A few days later, over oysters and gluten-free Martinis, I pressed Forster on what I could do to end my expensive new hobby. He shrugged and swallowed a bivalve. Of collectors, he said, “There’s some pocket of rot in the oak of their soul that can only be patched up by watches.”

After Trump won, I went to Germany—specifically, to Glashütte, in the remote Müglitz Valley, in Saxony, between Dresden and Prague, where my Nomos Minimatik was born. The journey from Dresden by suburban train took me past churches and boxy G.D.R.-era dachas, a perfect Russian motif for a city that once hosted the budding K.G.B. spy Vladimir Putin. Glashütte, where German watchmakers began working in the nineteenth century, is now home to at least eight companies. The town, surrounded by the Ore Mountains, appears suddenly, its train platform hugged by buildings of cement, steel, and glass. Glashütte does not have so much as a proper restaurant, although every Tuesday a chicken man comes with a truck full of roasting birds, and pensioners dutifully line up as if the Berlin Wall had never fallen.

“Caring for machines is as essential as caring for yourself,” an old East German poster proclaims in one of Nomos’s workspaces. The company operates out of Glashütte’s old train station, and also a well-kept building stuffed with the latest Vitra furniture, situated on a hill overlooking the town. (There is also a design bureau in Berlin, on the Landwehr Canal.) The watches are marketed not to the one per cent but to the creative classes. “If an editor’s career is on the rise,” a German publishing friend said, “they’ll get a Nomos.”

“Too many Swiss watch companies have become M.B.A.’d and are run like Procter & Gamble,” the watch collector Kiran Shekar had told me in New York. Nomos is the opposite of that. And there is a political element, too. Saxony has not been immune to the racist stirrings of the Alternative für Deutschland party, challenging Angela Merkel’s ruling coalition. When an AfD march was planned for Glashütte, the company put up a sign reading, in German, “We tick internationally. No to right-wing propaganda. Yes to tolerance and cosmopolitanism, and to people who need our help now.”

Visiting a watch manufactory is a soothing experience during chaotic times, and the painfully slow assembly of these beautiful objects may well fall under the heading of “God’s work.” At the Nomos workshop, a monastic silence prevailed as men and women (there are more of the latter than the former) sat at desks, wearing what looked like pink finger condoms and sifting through parts, some of them thinner than a human hair. The work is difficult and takes a toll. Because their hands need to be steady, watchmakers cannot drink profusely. According to Nadja Weisweiler, who works for the German retailer and watch manufacturer Wempe, they are encouraged to take up musical instruments or horseback riding. I observed with special delight as a watchmaker inserted a balance wheel into a new watch, and it came to life for the first time.

At Nomos, the dignity of work is still celebrated, and the company provides an example of what a creative manufacturing workplace can look like at a time when making things is rarely the province of humans. Nomos’s design bureau, in Berlin, is light-filled and cheery. The minimally bearded designers turn to everyday objects for inspiration. “We’re recoding heritage with contemporary influences from Berlin,” one of them told me. The neon orange that adds such cosmopolitan charm to my Minimatik, for example, came from the orange of warning signs seen in technical instruments and on the streets of the city. The avant-garde fonts for the numbers on the dial are stretched and opened up for better legibility. The intelligence of the design never proclaims the watch to be anything more than an instrument. “We know there are more important things than watches,” Judith Borowski, the company’s chief brand officer, said. “Like people suffering around the world.”

Nomos is doing well. The company’s sales increased by more than twenty per cent over the previous year, while the Swiss watch industry is suffering, in part because of the decline of several important markets, such as China and Russia, and, at a certain level, the preponderance of smart watches like Apple’s. Because Nomos aims for a younger demographic, its C.E.O., Uwe Ahrendt, is optimistic. “The good thing about smart watches is that young people started caring about their wrists again,” he told me in Glashütte. “They’ll start off with a smart watch and then they’ll switch to mechanical.”

After visiting Nomos, I crossed the road to A. Lange & Söhne. Ferdinand Adolph Lange, the godfather of German watchmaking, founded the company in 1845, as part of a Saxon king’s anti-poverty measures. The region was chiefly known for mining, but it was also famous for basket-weaving, and the dexterity required for that was used to make precise ticking things. After the Second World War, the Soviets nationalized the company and carted the best equipment off to Russia. Walter Lange, the great-grandson of Ferdinand, was about to be conscripted to work in an East German uranium mine, when he fled to the West. In 1990, after the Wall fell and when Lange was sixty-six years old, he returned to Glashütte and brought the company back to life. The new watches were soon beloved, especially by collectors who didn’t care about Lange’s pricing (entry-level Langes start at nearly fifteen thousand dollars, which some people consider a bargain).

In contrast to the freewheeling Nomos, Lange has an air of secrecy and tradition. To enter the inner sanctum, I had to surrender my phone and put on a lab coat. Lange’s timepieces are beautiful in an eerie way that collapses the differences between centuries, speaking to a world interrupted and then, against all odds, resumed. The watchmakers use gold chatons with steel screws to hold down the rubies that act as a lubrication system for the watch. There is absolutely no need for gold chatons at this point—the technology has moved on—but Lange insists on using them.




Walter Lange died this year, at the age of ninety-two, and the success of his company can be seen as a form of revenge against the totalitarian Soviet interregnum. The results are almost perversely opulent. Parts of the mechanism are finished by hand but are never meant to be seen by the owner; only the watchmaker and subsequent watch repairers will see the work in full. When I look at the back of a Datograph, one of Lange’s more complicated watches (it features a date as well as a chronograph, a kind of stopwatch), I see a small city of silver and gold gears and wheels, a miniature three-dimensional universe in which everyone is running to catch the next bus. If only our own daily exertions could be so purposeful and ornate. If only watches could do what they so slyly promise. To record. To keep track. To bring order.

As the Inauguration approached, I bought another watch. I knew I had to stop, but I had an excuse. I desperately needed a waterproof watch for swimming, my only form of exercise. By my hopeless logic, the watch would make me healthier. I went to Wempe’s emporium on Fifth Avenue, which is just a few doors down from Trump Tower, and feels like a meditation on the calmness of wood and the serenity of the color beige. It was early in the day, but already some gentlemen had stumbled in for their watch-fondling. “Tell me which watch you like and I’ll tell you how long I have to work for it,” one man was telling his five-year-old son. I was served an espresso and a Lindt chocolate by a young man who also presented me with a Tudor Heritage Black Bay 36, a glowing black-dial water-resistant watch bearing the famous “snowflake” hour hand of Tudor (a sister company of Rolex). I bought it, whereupon a small bottle of Veuve Clicquot was opened, and although the iconic snowflake hand was still two hours short of noon, I drank it down to the last. In total, I had now given up 10.1 days of artistic freedom to four watches in the course of less than a year.

Hodinkee invited me to a secret event at an undisclosed location. A black Lincoln MKT picked me up and half an hour later we arrived at a swish bar in midtown. Meanwhile, twenty-one of the world’s most significant watch collectors were making similar, if longer, journeys, from as far away as London and Los Angeles. They had no idea what awaited them. At the bar, Ben Clymer unveiled the project that Hodinkee had been working on for more than a year. The company had taken a famous Vacheron Constantin watch known as the Cornes de Vache (its lugs are shaped like cow horns), swapped out the platinum or the rose gold for humble steel, switched the white or silvered dial for a slate-gray one, and changed the tachymeter scale on the rim of the dial, which measures distance or speed, for a pulsation scale, which helps measure the beating of the human heart.

Vacheron Constantin is a storied Swiss maison (Napoleon wore one of its watches). Amid the aah-ing of the audience, I ran over to be the first to feel metal against flesh. Collectors gathered around, taking snaps of the watch on my wrist. The atmosphere simmered with the strange happiness of our little world, the feeling of being finally at the right place, if maybe not in the right time. The price of the watch was forty-five thousand dollars, and only thirty-six of them would be available for sale. Momentarily, I reviewed my finances. What if . . .

Shortly afterward, I met with a well-known collector and the editor of the watch site TimeZone who goes by the nom de plume William Massena, an ursine man with a strong Continental accent and even stronger horological opinions (“I used to get death threats!”). The timepieces in his collection were subtle yet striking. As Massena showed me the gorgeous faded-brown dial of a Rolex Submariner, akin to a model issued to members of the British Navy, I told him how I had got into watches at the start of 2016, when our nation was vulnerable but still whole. “Ah,” he said, in a burst of European pragmatism, “but you are a little Russian émigré. You know if you need to you can put these watches in your pocket and sneak across the border to Canada past Buffalo. And you can survive.”

A memory arrived unbidden. The year was 1978, and my family and I were at Pulkovo Airport, in Leningrad, about to become Soviet refugees in America. A stern customs officer took off my furry shapka and poked at the still warm lining, looking for diamonds my parents might have hidden there. A six-year-old is humiliated, but perhaps a lesson is learned. What if we had stashed away some diamonds and somehow got them through to freedom? In talking to collectors, I have heard the tale of a grandfather who was able to escape Occupied France because he gave a gold Omega to a stationmaster. Is this it, then? Is that what my obsession is about?

I will stop buying watches. But allow me one last purchase. It comes, via eBay, from San Luis Potosí, a city in north-central Mexico. It is a Casio H-108 12-Melody-Alarm, the kind I had lost to the Hebrew-school bully and my grandmother had reclaimed. The watch feels small, digital, innocent. It dutifully plays all the songs I remember. The word “happy” appears in eighties letters as the birthday song plays. And, for a moment, I am. ♦

Gary Shteyngart is the author of “Absurdistan,” “Super Sad True Love Story,” and “Little Failure,” a memoir. More
This article appears in other versions of the March 20, 2017, issue, with the headline “Time Out.”

Saturday, 18 February 2017

Moving forward ...

Here I am, on the aptly named Sunset Drive in Miami, feeling like it's getting dark. I just had my performance review and for the first time in 7 years, I received an average rating. In the recent past, the Good and Very Good ratings I've attained are deserved on the back of both high growth of the business both on the personal as well on the system front. This is therefore not unexpected. I did hope for better, on the back of stepping into a new global role. That said, I know I have yet to secure my seat at this high table. So, hope remains.



Walking around Sunset Place, a stereotypical American mall, with my performance appraisal still percolating in my mind, He reached out. A store under renovation had smartly pasted famous quotes in the covered windows. One that spoke directly to me was Helen Keller's "Optimism is the faith that leads to achievement. Nothing can be done without hope and confidence". 

I was in Sunset Place primarily to visit the Barnes & Noble store there. I bought 19 items. A tote bag that snugly contained 17 vinyl records,  and a leather bound gilt edged King James Bible. The records are an ecelectic mix, as usual. From a couple of Beatles and MJ albums to folk classics of Neil Young and Van Morrison, Green Day's iconic Dookie, Journey's Greatest Hits, even a YoYo Ma orchestral record and one that simply called to me: Frank Sinatra sings out "Come Fly With Me".

The best revenge, Old Blue Eyes once said, is massive success. With that thought in mind, I am moving forward. 

Wednesday, 1 February 2017

Blowing my mind

There's a starman waiting in the sky
He'd like to come and meet us
But he thinks he'd blow our minds
There's a starman waiting in the sky
He's told us not to blow it
'Cause he knows it's all worthwhile

In the last quarter of 2016, I went on a shopping spree... for vinyl records. It was never a format of my time. The prevalent music medium was the 8-track (which played like a dream on my dad's old car), then the cassette tape (which I made many of my own mixes, including one that I gave D that won her heart :-)) and then the CD, followed by mp3 and the various assortement of digital music files. Vinyls were before my time. But good things don't die. They make a comeback. So from Barnes and Noble in Washington DC and Chicago to treasure hunting in Red Point in a Singapore warehouse and Retrophonic in Chinatown and of course a bunch of online orders, I easily tripled my initial collection (which were largely gifts from dad and my friend R).

So, many enjoyable weekends were spent n the basement listening to the smooth silky sounds that only a record can produce. And then I put on David Bowie's Ziggy Stardust and the Spiders from Mars...


If there ever was a transcendent moment in music this must be it. The lyrics and music envelopes one into an entirely new world: Mars?

“A cop knelt and kissed the feet of a priest, and a queer threw up at the sight of that”

“Oh no, love! You’re not alone
You’re watching yourself, but you’re too unfair
You got your head all tangled up, but if I could only make you care,”

"Making love with his ego Ziggy sucked up into his mind
Like a leper messiah
When the kids had killed the man I had to break up the band."


Like Rubber Soul and Revolver, it changed my perception of music. This is a record I will go back to again and again.

And then there is the book. Vince Vaughn famously said that this was the last book he has ever read, and continues to re-read it. The book is Ayn Rand's The Fountainhead. It takes a lot longer the read the book than to listen to Bowie's seminal record. But it is worth every minute. I am still working through it, to the detriment of my health. Often, some bedtime reading soothes me and ease my entry into deep sleep. (Although I must say listening to the rosary does it even better!).

Then a book like The Fountainhead comes along and I couldn't put it down. One page compels you to carry on into another and another. Until one has read all about Keating, Toohey, Wynand, Francon and Roark, it cannot be put down.

Photo credit: Decoechoes


This book caused me to break a rule I held dear. Because I love the words and the knowledge they embody, all neatly bounded in a book so much, I have never allowed a page to be deliberately dog-eared. But then there were simply too many profound pronouncements in this book that I couldn't store them in my mind. I had to mark out these pages, alas, with a fold on the corner of the page. Here are a dozen, and these are not even my favourite!

“I love you so much that nothing can matter to me - not even you...Only my love- not your answer. Not even your indifference”  

“I could die for you. But I couldn't, and wouldn't, live for you.”

“There’s nothing as significant as a human face. Nor as eloquent. We can never really know another person, except by our first glance at him. Because, in that glance, we know everything. Even though we’re not always wise enough to unravel the knowledge.”

“Self respect is something that can't be killed. The worst thing is to kill a man's pretense at it.”  

“Man cannot survive except through his mind. He comes on earth unarmed. His brain is his only weapon. Animals obtain food by force. man had no claws, no fangs, no horns, no great strength of muscle. He must plant his food or hunt it. To plant, he needs a process of thought. To hunt, he needs weapons,and to make weapons - a process of thought. From this simplest necessity to the highest religious abstraction, from the wheel to the skyscraper, everything we are and we have comes from a single attribute of man -the function of his reasoning mind.”

“Freedom (n.): To ask nothing. To expect nothing. To depend on nothing.” 

“To sell your soul is the easiest thing in the world. That's what everybody does every hour of his life. If I asked you to keep your soul - would you understand why that's much harder?”  

“Throughout the centuries there were men who took first steps down new roads armed with nothing but their own vision. Their goals differed, but they all had this in common: that the step was first, the road new, the vision unborrowed, and the response they received — hatred. The great creators — the thinkers, the artists, the scientists, the inventors — stood alone against the men of their time. Every great new thought was opposed. Every great new invention was denounced. The first motor was considered foolish. The airplane was considered impossible. The power loom was considered vicious. Anesthesia was considered sinful. But the men of unborrowed vision went ahead. They fought, they suffered and they paid. But they won.”  

“But you see," said Roark quietly, "I have, let’s say, sixty years to live. Most of that time will be spent working. I’ve chosen the work I want to do. If I find no joy in it, then I’m only condemning myself to sixty years of torture. And I can find the joy only if I do my work in the best way possible to me. But the best is a matter of standards—and I set my own standards. I inherit nothing. I stand at the end of no tradition. I may, perhaps, stand at the beginning of one.”  

“I don't wish to be the symbol of anything. I'm only myself.”
 

“Integrity is the ability to stand by an idea.”

“You have been the one encounter in my life that can never be repeated”I do hope I will continue to encounter more records and more books like these. Stuff that blows my mind!

Tuesday, 31 January 2017

Family, Festivals, Fellowship

My dad pronounced suddenly over drinks this CNY that, "to get to know someone, you have to spend at least two days with them". He's a simple man, not given to saying much, let alone hyperbole . So, I am extremely pleased that he drew on his 75+ years of experience and wisdom.

He said it in the context of meeting Dawn's Aunt and family (M&M with N&N) whom he has met before but had no real recollection of. They had visited for CNY and Uncle M looked after my car many of which could not start or move. He diagnosed them all, changed the battery for one, topped up the motor oil of another and figured out the remaining issues with the third. He is one of Asia's top mechanic, a shining example of what it means to pursue one's passion wholeheartedly. So passionate is he in the field, that post his retirement, at an age when most would take it easy, he opened up his own garage and now serves high end customers.

It's a lot like my parents and parents-in-law. My parents too stayed in the sector and started, ran and then sold off a kindergarten. My father-in-law A kept busy with a variety of community and handy jobs, always looking to add value. Indeed, our house's look and feel owes a lot to him.

Their grandson J is charting his own course now, and staying true to this spirit. Indeed, the armed forces have a good practice of having family members write to the man in uniform as they are undergoing a difficult field exercise to help console and even encourage them. As I wrote my third such letter (the earlier ones were when he was in Basic Military Training and then in Officer Cadet School), I shared with him how proud I am of him, of his spirit especially: reaching high and always still looking out for those around him.

His sister and mom similarly love him for this and this extends to his family and friends too. We had a chance to experience all these for we celebrated two festivals in two months.

We hosted Christmas (named the best family Christmas celebration of all times!) where D truly outdid herself. We ate, danced, drank, massaged, performed, played, prayed, swam and watched over three days together. It could well be the last time (in a while) where every single of the family will be together for such a long time. And if you go by dad's maxim, we all got to know each other well!

Then we welcomed the chinese lunar year of the rooster and again hosted dinner and lunch, showed off fireworks, as well as procuring our traditional lion dance. This has gone on for over a dozen years and may also be one our lasts. Not that we have outgrown tradition, but rather it is now part of our history, part of us and shall remain for posterity. No doubt, from time to time we will request for them to perform again. Its only apt for as we all become digital embedded, we need the occassional (or more than ocassional) human interaction.

Photo Credit: D, whose photography skills though I seldom fete is really better at it than many others!
 
Fellowship is founded on real connection. And if there is a lesson about keeping family and friends in a festive mood, it is about staying in real touch, and as my dad would add, for at least two days!